We're Engineers Who Got Tired of Bad Hires

The Problem We Lived

In our engineering days, we worked with developers who couldn't write production code, "senior" engineers who needed hand-holding, and teammates who disappeared after collecting their first paycheck. The traditional hiring process was broken — resume reviews, generic coding tests, and gut-feel interviews weren't cutting it.

When we moved into IT staffing, we saw the other side. Companies were desperate for quality talent, willing to pay premium rates, but kept getting burned by candidates who looked great on paper but couldn't deliver. The cost of a bad hire isn't just salary — it's delayed projects, frustrated teams, and lost opportunities.

We realized that the vetting process — not the talent supply — was the bottleneck. Great developers exist worldwide. The challenge is finding and verifying them at scale.

What We Built

We spent 18 months building a vetting engine that does what humans can't at scale. It evaluates code quality, problem-solving patterns, and technical depth using AI — while proctoring prevents the cheating that plagues traditional assessments.

The result? A network of 50,000+ developers who've proven they can actually do the work. Not just talk about it — do it.